公共管理与政策评论
   首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告服务  |  数据库收录  |  期刊获奖  |  联系我们  |  English
公共管理与政策评论  2017, Vol. 6 Issue (2): 3-18    DOI:
理论探讨 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索  |   
论作为认知、行为与规范的制度
 全文: PDF (1064 KB)   HTML (1 KB)  输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 

不理解制度,就不能够理解人类社会自身及其运行逻辑。制度的复杂性导致了研究视
角的多样性,这也是制度理论多样性的基础。经济学家偏好行为和规范的视角,哲学家更偏好认知
的视角,这形成了制度研究的三个主要理论流派,即“作为均衡的制度理论” “作为规则的制度理
论”和“作为构成性规则的制度理论”。在试图沟通制度理论的哲学与经济学研究中,很多学者提
出了寻找制度的统一理论的设想。这些设想基本上是对制度研究的认知、行为和规范研究视角的整
合。与单一视角的理论受到争论一样,整合视角的统一理论也没有达成共识。制度理论研究的未来
取决于制度研究的哲学和经济学能否有效整合,更好地涵盖认知、行为和规范的视角,实现个体维
度与社会维度的统一,真正理解作为社会实在的制度及其意蕴。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李文钊
关键词制度   规则   均衡   统一理论     
Abstract
we cannot understand the human society and its logics unless we can understand institutions. As for this problem the philosophy and economics have different views. The complexity of institutions results in the multiple perspectives for studying institutions, which are the basis for the diversity of institutional theories. As for economists, they prefer the perspectives of behavior and normative account. As for philosophy, they prefer the perspective of cognition. These perspectives form the three main theories of institutional study, namely “rules account”, “equilibrium account”, and “constitutive rules account”. In trying to communicate the studies between the philosophy and economics, some scholars propose the unified theory of institutions. These proposals mainly integrate two or three of the three perspectives of institutional researches. Just as the contest in the unitary perspective of institutional researches, there also exist the different views about the unified theories of institution. The future of institutional researches depends on the cooperative relationship between the philosophy and economics, especially integrating the cognitive, behavior and normative perspective efficiently. At the same time, we also need to coordinate the individual and social dimensions of institutional research by understanding the institutions as social realities and social ontology.
Key wordsInstitutions')" href="#">   
引用本文:   
李文钊. 论作为认知、行为与规范的制度[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2017, 6(2): 3-18.
$author.xingMing_EN. [J]. journal1, 2017, 6(2): 3-18.
链接本文:  
http://xsqks.ruc.edu.cn/Jweb_ggglyzcpl/CN/     或     http://xsqks.ruc.edu.cn/Jweb_ggglyzcpl/CN/Y2017/V6/I2/3
 
没有找到本文相关图表信息
没有本文参考文献
没有找到本文相关文献
版权所有 © 2012 《公共管理与政策评论》编辑部
电话: 010-62512726 邮政编码:100080

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发   技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn